🔗 Share this article

Do your LinkedIn followers recognizing you as a thought leader? Are hordes of respondents applauding your insights on expanding your venture? Do recruiters reaching out to discuss collaborations?

If not, the explanation might be that you're not male.

The Experiment: Changing Profile Gender to achieve Better Visibility

Dozens of women joined an organized LinkedIn experiment this week after popular discussions indicated that changing their profile gender to "man" boosted their platform visibility.

Other testers rewrote their professional summaries to include what they called "masculine-oriented" terminology - inserting results-driven professional jargon like "drive", "revolutionize" and "accelerate". Based on reports, their exposure similarly increased.

Systemic Preference Concerns Brought Up

The engagement increase has led some to speculate whether a built-in gender bias in the platform's system favors men who use online business jargon.

Like most major social media platforms, LinkedIn utilizes an algorithm to determine which content appear to which members - promoting some while reducing others.

Company Statement

Through a company announcement, LinkedIn recognized the phenomenon but claimed it does not consider "demographic information" when deciding post visibility. Instead, the company mentioned that "hundreds of signals" affect how content are received.

Changing gender on your profile does not affect how your posts shows up in search or feed.

Individual Results

Simone Bonnett, who changed her pronouns to "male pronouns" and her name to "a masculine version", described extraordinary results.

"The statistics I'm seeing indicate a 1,600% increase in visitor traffic and a 1,300% increase in content views," she noted.

Another professional, a marketing expert, began experimenting after noticing her reach decrease significantly.

The Process

• First, she changed her gender to "man"
• Subsequently, she used AI tools to rephrase her profile using "masculine-oriented" wording
• Lastly, she repurposed previous content with similar "agentic" style

The result was instantaneous: a 415% increase in reach within one week.

The Negative Aspect

Despite the positive results, Cornish voiced unhappiness with the approach.

"Before, my content were more personal - brief and clever, but also warm and human," she stated. "Currently, the bro-coded version was forceful and confident - like a Caucasian man swaggering around."

She abandoned the experiment after one week, stating "Every day I persisted, and results improved, I became angrier."

Varying Outcomes

Some participants encountered positive results. One writer who modified both her gender to "man" and her ethnicity to "Caucasian" described a reduction in reach and interaction.

"We know there's systemic preference, but it's very challenging to comprehend how it functions in particular situations or why," she remarked.

Wider Consequences

These tests occur alongside ongoing discussions about LinkedIn's distinctive role as both a business platform and social space.

Platform modifications in the past few months have apparently resulted in female creators experiencing markedly lower visibility, resulting in unofficial tests where the same posts by men and women received vastly different audience engagement.

System Details

Per LinkedIn, the platform uses artificial intelligence to classify and distribute content based on various elements, including post content and the member's career profile.

The company states it regularly evaluates its algorithms, including "checks for gender-related disparities."

A spokesperson suggested that recent declines in some users' reach might stem from higher volume due to more content on the network.

Changing Landscape

As one participant observed, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be growing on the platform.

"People often view LinkedIn as more professional and polished," she commented. "This is evolving. It's becoming increasingly aggressive and unpredictable."